When using two MOD-IO2 boards controlled from one Olimex A20 board, I get I2C errors.
It starts with an ENXIO error, and later ENODEV on I2C communication attempts after the first ENXIO. It also happens when reopening the file handle every time and can even be reproduced with modio2tool:
#!/bin/sh
set -ex
./modio2tool -A 0x20 -T 0xF
./modio2tool -A 0x20 --setpullups 0xF
./modio2tool -T 0xF
./modio2tool --setpullups 0xF
./modio2tool -A 0x20 -i 0
./modio2tool -A 0x20 -i 1
./modio2tool -i 0
./modio2tool -i 1
./modio2tool -p 41
./modio2tool -p 51
./modio2tool -p 61
./modio2tool -i 0
./modio2tool -i 1
./modio2tool -S 3
./modio2tool -A 0x20 -S 3
./modio2tool -i 0
./modio2tool -i 1
./modio2tool -S 0
./modio2tool -A 0x20 -S 0
./modio2tool -p 40
./modio2tool -p 50
./modio2tool -p 60
With following output:
+ ./modio2tool -A 0x20 -T 0xF
+ ./modio2tool -A 0x20 --setpullups 0xF
+ ./modio2tool -T 0xF
+ ./modio2tool --setpullups 0xF
+ ./modio2tool -A 0x20 -i 0
GPIO0: 1
+ ./modio2tool -A 0x20 -i 1
GPIO1: 1
+ ./modio2tool -i 0
GPIO0: 1
+ ./modio2tool -i 1
GPIO1: 1
+ ./modio2tool -p 41
done.
GPIO: 0x10
+ ./modio2tool -p 51
done.
GPIO: 0x30
+ ./modio2tool -p 61
done.
GPIO: 0x70
+ ./modio2tool -i 0
GPIO0: 1
+ ./modio2tool -i 1
GPIO1: 1
+ ./modio2tool -S 3
+ ./modio2tool -A 0x20 -S 3
+ ./modio2tool -i 0
GPIO0: 0
+ ./modio2tool -i 1
GPIO1: 0
+ ./modio2tool -S 0
error!
+ ./modio2tool -A 0x20 -S 0
+ ./modio2tool -p 40
error!
GPIO: 0x00
+ ./modio2tool -p 50
error!
GPIO: 0x00
+ ./modio2tool -p 60
error!
GPIO: 0x00
The errors do not always occur on the same spots but in some sequences an error happened in every try so far.
How can I avoid getting these I2C errors?
I just found out that they can also occur when only using a single MOD-IO2 board. So maybe it is only some overload problem:
https://www.olimex.com/forum/index.php?topic=5178.msg21517#msg21517
In the kernel logs I found:
[ 719.845050] i2c i2c-2: mv64xxx_i2c_fsm: Ctlr Error -- state: 0x2, status: 0x0, addr: 0x20, flags: 0x0
I don't know if it is related, though.
How fast are the commands executed? Is there any delay in between?
The delays depend on input, so there is no guarantee of any delay in between. Is there some requirement of a minimum delay? Shouldn't the kernel driver take care of this?
I am not even sure if modio2tool works fine with latest MOD-IO2 firmware. The tool was published 7 years ago, the latest update to the firmware 3 years ago. Might be that the issue is in the modio2tool.
Errors now occur much less (about 2-3 errors a day when doing two request every 10ms). Relays now work reliable. There was a combination of problems, following guidelines helped me to avoid them:
- larger AC loads (>>10W) might need Snubber circuits
- larger DC loads might need a diode
- avoid switching relays faster than every ~200ms
- avoid Snubber parallel to switch on smaller loads
- avoid multiple appliances that might create interferences on the same board (i.e. connect larger loads to different mod-io2)
- Snubbers as near to load as possible
No guarantee on correctness. The later the guideline the more doubtful you should be ;)
I didn't find any difference in robustness between Mod-IO and Mod-IO2. With Mod-IO2, however, it is a bit easier to separate higher loads to different boards. Even if separated, the ~200ms rule was needed, though.
best regards,
Markus
I could improve the i2c problems by reducing the i2c bus speed. The overlay is part of https://opensesame.libelektra.org/ (files/i2c_2_clock_freq_overlay.dtbo see also doc/I2C.md).